Indian social order is one which is fundamentally classified into various intricate echelons. The foundations of these stratifications are plentiful. Broadly the society has been divided on religion basis, and then re-divided on caste root, then again subdivided on economical factors. The term ‘Broadly’ verbalize that the list is not exhaustive, and given the umpteen ramifications and scriptures of the segregation it could never be. The most despondent divisor had doubtlessly been caste system. There is nothing so unique in India, nothing as all-pervasive in India as caste. A great deal has been debated over its genesis, and even more on it’s dismantling. But we still lack the fundamental information on how and why it was introduced and we still lack the imperative knowledge on how it should be brought to a conclusion (read end).
The Hindu caste system is based on an assumption that lies at odds with the assumption of Western democratic ideals: that all people are created equal. According to classical Hindu perspective people are born with different intellectual and spiritual qualities and capabilities. These differences dispose different people to different sorts of occupations and responsibilities in society. There are theories illuminating how the Vedas advocated the division of society on the basis of work in order to effect specialization which later on was restructured on birth basis. If that is to be accepted then given razor sharp specialization of todays highly competitive world we don’t need it anymore and should shorn it off.
The only purpose which the caste system seems to dole out in the 21st century India is to serve as a decisive tool in the hands of the valueless demagogue to divert the flow of votes. The Mandal commission and recent reservation hullaballoo are shining example.
The societal is such that even in a well educated family where the head has been taught that racism is an immoral concept the lessons of this system are tacitly passed to the younger ones. One is straightforwardly or circuitously made conscious of his position in the social hierarchy. One is taught what he should lay his hand on and what Untouchables thing one should avoid. Given the narrowing economical gap between the different castes (due to reservations) one is confronted with situations where you have to play host to an untouchable guest, so people developed the practice of maintaining separate utensils to serve them.
Everything alienated to avoid any physical contact. One marvels is there something which is above these social boundaries. Something such, which is permeable through the walls of these social barriers. Something which is not minded even it is being transferred from an untouchable. Yes there is one thing in my observation. We just accept it happily. We may mind giving it back to them. No its not respect or submission from there part and not any other abstract object. It’s purely materialistic. In fact it is the pedestal of materialism. Its polish seems to over shine any shadow of prejudice on caste basis or whatsoever. Its color is so glinting and lucrative to let you care about any discrepancy. Such is the color of Money.
2 comments:
Very well said...The money is the only thing which is hostile to the phenomena 'UNTOUCHABILITY'..
To add something; it should be 'The positive Color of Money'.
The real color is far more tangled.
Well you took your thoughts one step further. Great.
Rightly said 'The real color is far more tangled'.
Let's not Tango deep into it right now.
Post a Comment